Not every gap in the log is a missed dose. Sometimes you deliberately skip — travel, an illness, a routine that fell apart for a week, a prescriber conversation that adjusted the plan. From the outside, in the log, a skipped week and a missed week look the same.
A row with no entry. They aren't the same. A missed dose is a question for next week — what got in the way, can the cue be moved, what changes about the routine.
A skipped dose is a question for the appointment — what was the reason, what did you decide, what did you watch for in the days that followed. Prescribers will ask the same thing both ways if the row is just empty. The fix is a one-tap label on the entry.
A skipped dose is a question for the appointment — what was the reason, what did you decide, what did you watch for in the days that followed.
Two tags is enough. 'Missed' and 'skipped — intentional'. The intentional skip gets a one-line note attached — what triggered it, what you decided, when you restarted. Three or four words is plenty. 'Food poisoning, restarted Sunday' is a different conversation than the prescriber assuming you forgot.
The distinction is small in any single week and large across the year — the unlabelled gaps are the ones that get re-litigated at every appointment because nobody remembers what they were, and Titra has a notes-and-tags field on every weekly row exactly for this kind of label.